Stablecoin remittances hit 9% in Bank of Italy test
Banca d'Italia has released a July 2026 study finding that stablecoin remittances do not consistently beat traditional transfer services on cost or speed.
Summary
- Ten USDC corridors produced total remittance costs ranging from 0.30% to nearly 9%, researchers found.
- Under 20 minutes was achievable where instant payment systems supported both fiat conversion endpoints efficiently.
- Three corridors beat Wise, while four cost more, showing stablecoin savings remained highly corridor-specific overall.
Researchers executed real transfers of 200 USDC across ten corridors linking Italy with Argentina, Brazil, South Africa, the United Arab Emirates and Japan.
The mystery-shopping study recorded total costs from 0.30% to almost 9%. The blockchain leg averaged only 0.4%, while exchange purchases, funding methods, withdrawals and foreign-exchange conversion produced most of the expense. The authors said stablecoins showed "no systematic cost advantage" over traditional channels.
Stablecoin remittance costs varied sharply by corridor
The Italy-to-Argentina transfer was the cheapest at 0.30%, while Argentina-to-Italy cost 8.96%. The study warned that the low outbound Argentina result partly reflected differences between the country's official and market exchange rates, rather than blockchain efficiency alone.
Brazil-to-Italy cost 2.21%, compared with 2.70% in the opposite direction. South Africa-to-Italy cost 5.44%, while Italy-to-South Africa reached 4.58%. The two UAE routes were among the most expensive at 7.20% and 8.95%, partly because card funding and withdrawal charges increased the total.
USDC beat Wise in only three comparable routes
Banca d'Italia compared its transactions with Wise simulations for the same $200 amount. USDC was cheaper in three routes: Italy to Argentina, Italy to South Africa and Brazil to Italy. It was more expensive in four, including both UAE routes and Italy to Brazil.
The researchers cautioned that the transfers and Wise simulations occurred on different dates. They also described the World Bank comparison as an indicative benchmark rather than a like-for-like test. The paper covers one stablecoin and a limited number of transactions, so its findings "cannot be readily generalized" to every provider or corridor.
Fast domestic payments determined transfer speed
The onchain portion took less than 15 minutes in seven of eight directly comparable corridors. However, complete settlement depended on the banking systems used to fund exchanges and withdraw local currency.
Transfers involving Italy's TIPS, Brazil's Pix and Argentina's Transferencias 3.0 finished in under 20 minutes. South African routes took one or two business days because standard bank transfers slowed the fiat endpoints. The study therefore found that stablecoin rails and domestic instant-payment systems worked as complements, not substitutes.
Japan presented a separate problem. The Japan-to-Italy transfer cost 1.6%, but regulatory limits required an unhosted wallet and fragmented transactions, making the process unsuitable for a direct timing comparison. The reverse route cost 1.3% without completing the final off-ramp.
-- Price
Better on-ramps may matter more than cheaper blockchains
The findings support Banca d'Italia Governor Fabio Panetta's May assessment that stablecoins may work in selected corridors but do not provide a universal answer to expensive remittances. He argued that regulators should improve domestic payment infrastructure and connect fast-payment systems across borders.
A March 2026 BIS paper reached a related conclusion, identifying weak interoperability, fragmented standards and institutional differences as the main barriers to cheaper cross-border payments. That suggests blockchain settlement alone cannot remove compliance, banking and local-currency bottlenecks.
Industry deployments continue to test the other side of the argument. As crypto.news reported, Borderless.xyz found competitive stablecoin pricing across 260 business-payment corridors during the second quarter. In related coverage, a Hyundai trial moved $20,000 between the U.S. and Mexico in about seven minutes, while SBI Remit partnered with Fasset to develop stablecoin remittance infrastructure.
Those cases do not directly contradict the central-bank experiment. They involve different transfer sizes, business models and endpoints. The next step is broader testing across more tokens, providers, dates and transaction amounts, with full disclosure of exchange spreads, withdrawal costs and local payout times.
This content is provided for general informational purposes only and doesn't constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Any events, rewards, online promotions, or related information mentioned herein should not be considered a recommendation, solicitation, or invitation to purchase, sell, trade, or otherwise deal in any crypto assets. Crypto assets are highly volatile and may result in loss. The availability of WEEX services, products, and related events may vary by region. You are responsible for ensuring that your participation is in accordance with applicable local laws and regulations.
You may also like

S&P 500 Q2 Earnings Growth of 31%, Year-End Target Raised to 7894 Points

Nansen CEO bets on AI agents to overtake human traders within two years

TOKEN2049: Exclusive Info and Promo Code

UVA Mortgage: How Much Do You Need to Earn to Buy a $100,000 Apartment?

Wall Street is buying privacy while centralized exchanges are delisting it

Metaplanet Buys 1,007 More Bitcoin As Treasury Hits 20,000 BTC

Yen Soars, Dollar Falls: Bitcoin Benefits... But For How Long?

Bittensor vs Render Whitepaper Comparison (2026): AI Infrastructure, Tokenomics, and Network Design

BitGo Brings Gold, Real Estate And Fine Art Tokenization To Core Chain

US August ISM Services PMI Rises to 55.4%, Expanding for 26 Consecutive Months

Housing Rental Prices in Odesa Rise: Trends and Demand in 2026

The Cost of AI Tokens in Free Fall: Should We Be Worried?

HTX DAO Launches $10M Genesis Program to Propel the Crypto-AI Convergence and Advance Financial Freedom

S&P Dow Jones Partners with French Kaiko to Launch a Series of Crypto Indices

Chairman of Solana Foundation: The Internet Capital Market Will Become the Largest Capital Market

European Savings Confiscation: Is State Appropriation of Private Assets Inevitable?

Bahrain Leads the Race for Stablecoins in the Middle East, But Where Are the Coins?

Google Escapes Breakup, but Will Face New Rules

Behind the $399 Machine Duck Sales Boom: How Shenzhen Became the 'Hardware Base' for Physical AI?

South Korea's Crypto Market: A Guide for the Second Half of 2026

OmniOps and HPE Sign MoU at LEAP to Support Development of Sovereign AI Solutions in the Kingdom

Arthur Hayes: Bitcoin Could Reach One Million Dollars by 2030, but Ethereum is My Top Choice

Bitcoin Price Ahead of Jobs Report: Has Crypto Already Priced In the Fed's Next Move?

Isabel Schnabel to Leave ECB for IMF Position Before 2027

NDV: Bitcoin, the Core Asset in the Era of Dollar and Bitcoin Overissuance

Crypto: The Fake GTA 6 That Drains Your Wallet

Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana: Who is really the most decentralized?

Robinhood put stocks on a permissionless blockchain- memecoin traders are stress-testing what happens next

Bitcoin: Buy High and Sell Low, Strategy Justifies and Explains Its Choices




